24.02.23 / Embargo / Press Release

Razom We Stand, Global Witness and climate groups demand full embargo on the export of Russian oil

Kyiv, London, Berlin, Budapest

One year on from Russia’s illegal full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the price cap on Russian oil isn’t working. Governments should scrap the cap and institute a ban on the trade of Russian oil.  

Kyiv, London, Berlin, Budapest // One year on from Russia’s illegal full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the price cap on Russian oil isn’t working. Governments should scrap the cap and institute a ban on the trade of Russian oil.  

The price cap is supposed to prohibit Western companies from enabling the trade of Russian crude, unless purchased for less than $60 a barrel. But evidence is mounting that the price cap, already far above Russia’s production costs, is having a limited impact on the trade of Russian oil.

The price cap of $60 was announced in December 2022. Now, commercially available data shows that in the Far East, Western companies are trading Russian oil which is selling above the price cap level. And multiple reports cite Chinese & Indian customs data suggesting that local importers bought Russian crude without a discount, at a similar price to Brent. The cap is proving little more than a G7-approved press release. 

Worse still, the price cap enforcement system relies on attestations, which amounts to an honour system, in the form of promises from the fossil fuel industry that officials may occasionally check. There has been no evidence of relevant authorities in any price cap country enforcing any penalties for violations. As a result, it’s unlikely that any trades have taken place beneath the price cap which would otherwise have taken place above it. 

This system is contributing to record Russian exports. January 2023 was Russia’s strongest month for oil exports since 2019. These exports, which Western companies continue to facilitate, are fuelling the war in Ukraine and delaying the energy transition. 

The U.S. has argued that maintaining the global supply of oil is essential, and that efforts to reduce Russia’s exports would result in higher prices and therefore even higher revenues for the Kremlin. But that ignores the control OPEC+ countries have over global oil prices. This factor will remain a constant with or without a price cap on Russian oil. 

If the price cap was enforceable, lower prices for producers might disincentivise oil production. But the increased incentive for consumers to use that cheaper oil would cancel out those climate benefits, and in practice the price cap has had no observable impact on Russian oil prices. Its only measurable impact has been to reduce restrictions on the global supply of Russian oil. That’s bad for Ukraine, and bad for the climate.   

Simple, enforceable, and well-enforced rules can have impact. The import bans on Russian oil and coal have reduced Russia’s revenues, by reducing demand. But the price cap is enabling Russian oil flows that we might otherwise be able to prevent. 

Russia’s fossil fuels embody existential threats to Ukraine, to democracy, and to the planet. The opportunity to keep them in the ground, to accelerate the energy transition and to gut Russia’s ability to wage war is not one we can afford to pass up. 

Razom We Stand – Ukraine 
Global Witness – United Kingdom 
Center for Environmental Initiatives "Ecoaction" – Ukraine 
Fridays For Future Ukraine
Urgewald – Germany 
Ecoclub Rivne – Ukraine
Clean Air Action Group – Hungary 
VCS Verkehrs Club der Schweiz – Switzerland
Warszawski Alarm Smogowy – Poland 
Transform Scotland – United Kingdom
Unique Planet – Ukraine 
Fundacja Promocji Pojazdów Elektrycznych – Poland 
Friends of the Earth Norway
Center for Biological Diversity – USA 
350.org - USA 

Click this link to download relevant images 

Press contacts:
Louis Wilson [email protected] 
Jason Kirkpatrick [email protected]

Press Release

As Ukraine's application for EU candidacy is being fast-tracked, and the EU is scrambling to reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, the move to have Ukraine comply with environmental accounting standards (GHG protocol and SBTi) and make data on  GHG emissions public is vital. Only with such measures can Ukraine and the EU meet recommendations of the UN IPCC scientific report this week.


Energy response to Russia's war: open letter with four requests to the EU
Campaign Updates

                                                                                          To: Ursula von der Leyen  
Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200
1049 Brussels

Frans Timmermans
Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat 200
1049 Brussels

Charles Michel
Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175  
B-1048 Bruxelles/Brussel 

Razom We Stand calls on the Ukrainian authorities to implement greenhouse gas emissions accounting in accordance with international standards and open climate data for public access
Campaign Updates

The organization reached out to Vice Prime Minister Mykhailo Fedorov, Minister of Digital Transformation of Ukraine, and Chair of the State Statistics Service of Ukraine, Ihor Verner, to stress the critical importance of accounting for greenhouse gas emissions.



The methane rush off the climate cliff: EU and US must halt gas infrastructure expansion

Razom We Stand strongly condemns the global push for gas infrastructure expansion, including LNG terminals, given the dire environmental and climate consequences, as well as financial risks involved in creating stranded assets. With excess windfall profits stemming from market volatility worsened by Putin’s brutal invasion in Ukraine, the gas industry must be subject to taxation and regulation, not supported with public subsidies for their expansion plans.